- ACTIVE SKY NEXT VS ACTIVE SKY 2016 UPDATE
- ACTIVE SKY NEXT VS ACTIVE SKY 2016 UPGRADE
- ACTIVE SKY NEXT VS ACTIVE SKY 2016 PLUS
Erica Wheeler dropped a season-high 22 points (tied two other times during the season) and dished out five assists against Chicago to help lift LA to victory. The 5-7 guard’s nasty crossover not only broke many ankles this season but showed her ability to score on teams’ top defenders. She averaged a career-high 13.7 points per game and finished 5th in clutch points in the WNBA. With ease, the 2019 All-Star MVP stepped in as the new point guard for the Sparks. Atlanta Dream, with 0.1 seconds remaining, she put up the game-winning put-back that gave the team a 66-64 win.Īfter not playing in 2020 due to being in WNBA Medical Protocol for the whole season, Erica Wheeler returned to the WNBA this season now on a new team and better than ever. Additionally, the 2016 MVP led the team in scoring (14.5) and hit big shots for the Sparks when they desperately needed them. Despite this, when Ogwumike was on the floor she fueled the team’s offense, leading them to a four-game win streak. Nneka Ogwumike battled with a knee injury this season missing a good portion of games. The Sparks finished the season, 12-20.Ĭonsidering all of the Sparks’ injuries, it will be interesting to see how Derek Fisher can rebuild next season with the majority of the team projected to be healthy. Unfortunately, the team lost by three points to the Dallas Wings and missed the Playoffs. This allowed the Sparks to still have a chance to clinch the eighth Playoff seed. 3 in the league) and offensive power came from the new addition of Erica Wheeler as she was second in points behind Ogwumike.
ACTIVE SKY NEXT VS ACTIVE SKY 2016 PLUS
Check there first, plus they have incremental updates so you don’t have to uninstall and reinstall the whole product.Head Coach, Derek Fisher’s goal to remake this team’s identity was halted as they battled with injuries all season long, with four players (including LA’s centerpiece Nneka Ogwumike) missing 72% of possible games.ĭespite this, the team’s gritty defense (No.
ACTIVE SKY NEXT VS ACTIVE SKY 2016 UPDATE
PS - I believe some of these update notifications are actually behind the latest versions available from HiFi. I’d be interested to hear other people’s opinions of AS16.
![active sky next vs active sky 2016 active sky next vs active sky 2016](https://my737ng.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/asn_header.jpg)
ACTIVE SKY NEXT VS ACTIVE SKY 2016 UPGRADE
But is it worth the full upgrade price? Pondering that, I guess I’d have to say yes if that what it takes to keep HiFi in business turning out such great products, patches and quick P3D updates. By extension so is AS16, and is made better by having ASCA coupled with it. Something about the colours used.ĪSCA is nice in that it varies the cloud texture set you’re seeing over longer flights, but the clouds themselves are arguably more prone to repetition and less refined than those of Texture Direct with Soft Clouds.Ī lot of this is down to personal opinion, not forgetting that I simply won’t fly without Active Sky something running. The interface has been reworked, and while it’s clearer in places, the map display (ie the most important one) is in my mind actually harder to interpret and read. It does seem to be a little better after the recent patches but again it’s hard to truly judge things.
![active sky next vs active sky 2016 active sky next vs active sky 2016](https://my737ng.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/asn_map.jpg)
It also tends to go off at times that don’t totally make sense. The new wisp effect sometimes looks OK and other times looks, well, kinda contrived and forced. So while reducing cloud density a notch triggers an AS16 warning about not getting the full effects, I think it actually looks better as I no longer have to deal with the overcast wall of nothing. I’ve recently turned clouds in P3D down from max to high to counter the crippling effect of SGSS that I need to make P3D look good. I found myself dealing with this wall of nothing very very frequently and it appeared to run counter to the METARs in question. But personally, to my mind and based upon my experience, it’s overdone. There’s a much more prevalent overcast effect - basically where you cannot see anything. I guess the test is that apart from the occasional popcorn and some cloud repetition, which was worse at launch I think, there’s nothing there that I look at and think “eh?” They say it’s better, and after flying it a while I kinda think it’s better.
![active sky next vs active sky 2016 active sky next vs active sky 2016](http://www.hifisimtech.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/AS16_MAP.png)
Maybe it looks better, but I’m wary of wishful thinking applying here. Is the weather depiction better than ASN? It’s really hard to say without doing a side by side comparison.
![active sky next vs active sky 2016 active sky next vs active sky 2016](http://www.hifisimtech.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/BEFOREANDAFTERASCA21.png)
To be honest I’m not completely and utterly sold on the upgrade and the revised per-platform pricing, though I can appreciate why they’ve done it. I upgraded from ASN to AS16 & ASCA not long after it was launched, coming from an ASN / Texture Direct 4 with Soft Clouds setup. An another topic - anyone using Active Sky 2016 and is it worth the upgrade?